Conservapedia

Happy Birthday to the Loch Ness Monster

Seventy-six years ago today, on November 12th 1933, Hugh Gray was walking back from chuch along the shores of Loch Ness when he saw an "object of considerable dimensions—making a big splash with spray on the surface."

"I immediately got my camera ready and snapped the object which was then two to three feet above the surface of the water. I did not see any head, for what I took to be the front parts were under the water, but there was considerable movement from what seemed to be the tail."

The result, seen below, was the very first photograph of the legendary Loch Ness monster.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Lenski II: Conservapedia to Take on PNAS

[@BPSDB] Andrew Schlafly, owner of Conservapedia - the homosexuality-obsessed site whose edit history and block list provide the answer to the question "Is a wiki better than a blog for expressing your personal opinion to an audience" - has come back for another round of the Lenski Affair. Not content with the answers he got from evolutionary biologist Lenski about perceived irregularities in Lenski's paper, Schlafly is taking the fight to the journal which published it - PNAS. Oh yes, that's right, he's sending them a letter (da-da DAAAAA). The text is below, between the dotted lines, following which I'll give a commentary.

No votes yet

The Classification of Nutters at RationalWiki

Try out RationalWiki's new feature, "Article of the Weak. It's an interesting new concept that aims to create a "taxonomy of the internet fringe". As TMToulouse says:

"My goal, once we have enough articles and votes to make it worthwhile is to create a searchable index of articles based on the criteria that you guys define. Basically a taxonomy of the internet fringe. If we get a good sized article base and votes I think this could be fascinating. A user could list all the articles that have a high "authoritarian" and "hypocrisy" score, or whatever they wished. Lots of fun statistics can be run on the voting distributions as well."

No votes yet

The Lenski "Debate": Missing Schlafly's Point

BPSDBThere's a lot of talk at the moment about the debate between evolutionary biologist Richard Lenski, and Andrew Schlafly of Conservapedia, about so-called "missing data". A good summary of it is up at RationalWiki (read it if you're not familiar with this affair), but I don't want to retread what others have gone over already.

No votes yet

Conservatives Don't Get STDs?

BPSDBAmid all the impotent flailing on Conservapedia, I stumbled across this little gem of a wild assertion, in the stomach-turning essay Marry a Conservative:

"Marry a conservative. Benefits include:
* freedom from sexually transmitted diseases and their harm (including infertility)"

Really? Conservatives don't get STDs? Well if that's true, then we should see some really striking results if we, say, create a table of the states with the highest STD rates, and colour them according to whether they're Republican (red) or Democrat (blue)...

No votes yet

Conservapedia's Reach: A Back-of-the-Envelope Study

BPSDBConservapedia, the infamous evangelical "trustworthy" alternative to wikipedia, claims to have a huge impact on the interweb. "Conservapedia has had over 49,400,000 page views and over 449,000 page edits. The truth shall set you free." Well 49 million page views sounds like a lot, but what's the real story? How big really is Conservapedia's reach? By my reckoning, it's not very big at all. Here are some vaguely scientific statistics and graphs for you.

Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

Conservapedia Editors Deny Denial, Denying Liberal Deniers' Comeback

I still can't work out if Conservapedia was (a) real, (b) a spoof or (c) a real project that just got turned into a spoof because of all of the nasty smelly liberals out there. I also - before anyone makes any tedious assumptions about my political orientation - wish there was a Liberopedia out there too which said that Clinton was a genius and Kennedy was assassinated by the Bush campaign and all vicars eat children, but sadly we'll have to wait for that one.

There are many examples of uninentional irony on Conservapedia: the irony of using computer technology to bash science; the irony of attacking Muslim fundamentalism; and the irony of declaring that the "truth will set you free" while stating elsewhere that the intention of the site is to be biased - to distort the truth.

No votes yet

Wikio - Top BlogsCurrent CO2 level in the atmosphere