America's Health, Wealth and Education Slump

While the government haemhorrages US$5bn a day on health spending, infant mortality is on a par with Estonia, life expectancy barely reaches Western standards, and 1 in 7 adults don't have the education required to read an average newspaper article or instruction manual, and some states lag 30 years behind others. It has 5% of the world's population, but a staggering 24% of its prisoners. Welcome to the United States of America.

The report looks at a number of different measures of "human development", primarily health, education and income. Taking all factors together, the U.S.A. fell 10 places to 12th in the world, behind 11 nations all of whom have lower GDPs per capita.

The level of inequality within the country was stark, "an average Connecticut resident earns 60 percent more, lives six years longer, and is almost twice as likely to have a college degree as a typical Mississippian." Even more shocking is the degree of disparity between races, "Nationally, Asian males have the highest human development index score and African American males the lowest, with a staggering 50-year gap between the two groups."

I've mentioned the state of American healthcare in passing before, when commenting on the fact that Cuba has been able to achieve a number of the same health metrics as the United States on a fraction of the budget. At the time, I observed that: "The American system meanwhile appears to haemorrhage cash, even in comparison with Britain's NHS - health in the United States is poor by European standards". A new report covered in The Guardian today, "Measure of America" by Oxfam America, seems to confirm that view.

The American health system appears to be suffering from chronic mismanagement. "Despite the fact that the United States spends roughly $5.2 billion every day on health care, more per capita than any other nation in the world, Americans live shorter lives than citizens of every Western European and Nordic country except for one." An Asian man in the United States lives, on average 14 years longer than his African American compatriot.

Meanwhile, US infant mortality rate is in the same league as countries like Cuba and Estonia, ranked 34th in the world. The Guardian note that "if the US could match top-ranked Sweden, about 20,000 more American babies a year would live to their first birthday."

And we Brits though the NHS was bad...

Moving on to poverty, it turns out that the richest fifth of Americans earn 15 times as much as the poorest fifth, who survive on an average of just $11,352pa, and 15% of children live in poverty. It's not just pay either - America falls far behind other Western nations in areas such as maternity leave, sick leave, and childcare.

The third major area is education. A worrying "14% of the population - some 40 million Americans - lack the literacy skills to perform simple, everyday tasks such as understanding newspaper articles and instruction manuals. While in much of Europe, Canada, Japan and Russia, levels of enrolment of three and four-year-olds in pre-school are running at about 75%, in the US it is little more than 50%."

I'm British, not American, but there are several questions I think our cousins across The Pond should be concerned about here, including (but not limited to) the following:

1) How can you have a functioning democracy if 1 in 7 people aren't capable of reading information about the candidates?

2) How is it possible that health is costing you far more per capita than any other nation, yet you're not even providing universal healthcare? Where is your money going?

3) Why have your leaders allowed such vast differences to open up between states that some are lagging 30 years behind others in health and education?

You can see the full report, including interactive maps and raw data, at http://www.measureofamerica.org/. It's well worth a look.

__________________

Martin is the editor of layscience.net.

Follow Me!
RSS | Twitter


Trackback URL for this post:
http://layscience.net/trackback/194

No votes yet
Linus (not verified) on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:21

Yaaaaaaaaaay us.

But, to respond to the questions:

1) How can you have a functioning democracy if 1 in 7 people aren't capable of reading information about the candidates?

A functioning democracy?

2) How is it possible that health is costing you far more per capita than any other nation, yet you're not even providing universal healthcare? Where is your money going?

Well, according to those with influence, universal health care would result in third-world-esque quality and huge amounts of wasted money. It would also result in massive bureaucratic waste, which obviously is greatly different from the current system.

3) Why have your leaders allowed such vast differences to open up between states that some are lagging 30 years behind others in health and education?

Because we have this ridiculously overblown idea of "states' rights". People like Ron Paul don't even believe that a federal Department of Education should exist.

Martin on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 16:29

I edited your mistake out ;)

Yes, those are pretty much the three responses I'd have picked as an outsider. It absolutely staggers me though, just how much money you guys are spraying at this with no real benefit. It looks like a right mess :|


__________________

Martin is the editor of layscience.net.

Follow Me!
RSS | Twitter

turbonerd (not verified) on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:24

It is. I've reads that malaria in Africa could be effectively controlled with the amount of money that the Pentagon spends in 3-4 days.

Also, do you know why I haven't received my validation e-mail? Did I enter an incorrect address? HELP ME, MARTIN.

turbonerd (not verified) on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:25

s/reads/read

Caffeine withdrawal…

Martin on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 19:42

It's because you have "turbon" in your name, and our Islamic filter can't spell. (Joke!!)

I honestly don't know what's happened regarding your user account...Try submitting again perhaps?



__________________

Martin is the editor of layscience.net.

Follow Me!
RSS | Twitter

turbonerd (not verified) on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 20:07

I'm actually Linus, but I'm using this pseudonym to post because my registration of the name "Linus" seems to be giving the software issues. It's there, but the e-mail confirmation hasn't been sent, so I can't create a password.

Martin on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 20:57

Ah... okay! Linus is there. I'll have a look into it tonight mate.

__________________

Martin is the editor of layscience.net.

Follow Me!
RSS | Twitter

turbonerd (not verified) on Thu, 07/17/2008 - 23:27

Most excellent, my profuse gratitude. :)

Bacopa (not verified) on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 06:24

where does the healthcare money go? It goes to countless middlemen who have to skim their little bit off the top each time the money changes hands a few times between patient and health care provider. It goes for TV ads for the latest variation of the latest drug that came out only two years ago and didn't do any more than some out-of-patent drug that came out twenty years ago.

There are some nationally administered health care programs Like Medicaid and the Veterans Administration (VA). These programs at least meet basic standards of efficency in that a fairly high percentage of the budget goes to providing healthcare, much more than in multiple middleman private insurance.

The VA has been doing a horrible job lately, but not because of waste or inefficency. The VA is simply underfunded and is unable to cope with the large number of wounded from our current wars. Bushies put some new people in charge who have tried to make things work by denying claims and offering substandard care. Even so, the VA remains fairly efficient.

The current wars have produced a huge number of wounded in proportion to dead. Armor, MRAPS, and excellent medical care in the field have greatly increased the proportion of wounded to dead, and we haven't prepared for this.


Wikio - Top BlogsCurrent CO2 level in the atmosphere